JeffB Show full post »
Northern Neighbour
elT wrote:


Now it is a rule?

Not almost any player, pretty sure I named actual individuals.

And I did address chemistry/fit in a speculative way because that is all left to do when talking about hypothetical chemistry projection. I did also mention some of advantages DAJ would give as well as Vucevic. But you just chose to ignore that because it was time for Beasley.


I missed your DJ / Vucevic part in your reply to DanH. 

On the 20% part, you mentioned it as if it was a rule or a common mathematical practice. I just called BS on it.

I will still question why you continue to look at ways to "upgrade" on JV when there are other areas of greater importance. The C position is the least of the Raptors' worries alongside the play of Lowry, Leonard, Green, and Siakam.
Quote 0 0
elT
Northern Neighbour wrote:


I missed your DJ / Vucevic part in your reply to DanH. 

On the 20% part, you mentioned it as if it was a rule or a common mathematical practice. I just called BS on it, and I will continue to do so unless proven otherwise. You have no evidence or support to back your assertion.

I will still question why you continue to look at ways to "upgrade" on JV when there are other areas of greater importance. The C position is the least of the Raptors' worries alongside the play of Lowry, Leonard, Green, and Siakam. 


I haven't mentioned math/rule/common practice once. There's so called 80-20 rule but I don't think it has anything to do with this, not even remotely. 80% of JV is how I see Greg Monroe. Some would say that is poor man's JV, maybe? I don't know. But even physically, if you took JV and multiplied him by 0.8, you'd get Monroe.

Again, I was responding to Dan's assertion. Wasn't looking to upgrade but mentioned some options other than AD that IMO would still be an upgrade. Said multiple times I'm not looking to break up JV/Ibaka.


Quote 0 0
JeffB
Ugly game
Quote 0 0